Date: 5 May 1999 13:14:20 -0000
Message-ID: <19990505131420.15831.qmail@nym.alias.net>
From: Ramsey <ramsey@nym.alias.net>
To: cheesy21@email.com
Subject: Hi
MIME-Version: 1.0

Patti,

>The address I have for Don Paugh is lost. it was something like
>don_paugh@yahoo.com or donaldpaugh@yahoo.com the street address >I have for them is 865 Brooksglen Dr Roswell, GA 30075-1365

You have the home address right. I mentioned their neighborhood, Brookfield West, in my e-mail to you, concerning the directions all over Atlanta. Hope you read that part. They have a beautiful home. Have you seen it? I have photos, of course. I doubt they will answer any mail concerning this case. They once placed a note on the welcome wreath on their door that read, "No Comment". I suppose you know all this.

>About your theory, can it been checked out, does John think this 
>person is the killer too? Why can't it be proven? Is John afraid 
>of this person and what he might do? How do you  imagine this 
>person has managed to not leave ONE MINUTE clue as to his 
>identity?  Do you think John's investigators will uncover 
>something soon? I sure hope so.

Yes, the family is afraid to some degree. Mostly the Ramseys are concerned for their child and the children of others. Everything John has ever touched, turns to gold, which might breed jealousy among those closely or distantly working with John. That was only one of many theories. I also pointed out that I believe a total stranger to John might have done this; a stalker and child killer.

>>I should have had the caption "Friend of JonBenet" on that
>>webpage instead of "Friend of the Ramseys".
>
>Yes I think that would have been better, you would probably get 
>as much mail though.

I don't care about the mail I get. It is mostly hateful anyway.

>I meant to ask you something, the Ramsey Family has a website. >It has not been maintained for over a year and the email address 
>there sends mail but it is never answered. Why is that? Why >don't they take it down rather than leaving it look abandoned.

That site has been quiet for the same reason I watch my every word and move. It was put up for the reason of allowing the family to make public comments; intended for the press to read mostly. It was decided that it might be wise to cease comments until the grand jury makes their decision. It has not been taken down because it might serve a purpose in the future.

>Do you think the police will come and arrest Patsy at home or 
>will she fly to Atlanta on her own, in company of her >attorney's. It sounded like they were not going to go for that >and that they were going to arrest her.

Let us hope no arrest will be made. If so, there will be full cooperation with the assistance of the family attorneys.

>What is your theory on why there seems to be so much of Patsy in 
>the ransom note? I think it is because that was the whole point. 

I think some of it is mere coincidence. The bonus parallel leads me to believe in the theory that the killer had inside info on John, hence, might be one of his business associates.

>I already asked this, but to me, it is important. Does John >think this person (that you have the theory about) killed >JonBenet? it has always appeared to me that John knew who killed >her but for some reason could not speak up about it.

If John had the least suspicion of who killed his daughter, he would walk, not run, to the authorities and report everything he knows.

Take Care